PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL DIRECT INSTRUCTION DAN MODEL INKUIRI PADA MATA PELAJARAN IPA KELAS V SDN 101816 PANCUR BATU TAHUN PEMBELAJARAN 2018/2019

Authors

  • ANGELIA KEKE BEGITA KEMBAREN FKIP Unika Santo Thomas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54367/aquinas.v2i1.358

Keywords:

Differences, Direct Instruction Models, Inquiry, Objects and Nature Models

Abstract

This Research aims to find out the differences of direct instruction model and inquiry model in improving learning outcomes of the fifth grade students on science subject with material objects and properties of objects at SDN 101816 Pancur Batu in academic year 2018/2019. The number of students population at SDN 101816 Pancur Batu in academic year 2018/2019 are 534 students. This sample taken by sampling purposive 66 students. The model used in the study is an experimental model is one-group pretest-posttest design.The model in this study uses experiments conducted in two groups, namely experiment I and experiment II. The instrument used to capture data is multiple choice tests in material objects and their properties.Based on statistical data processing in group I obtained the average results that is 73.23, standard deviation 6,85 and standard error 1.19 out of 34 students. For the experimental group II, the average results were 86.56, standard deviation was 6.55 and the standard error was 1.17 from the total 32 students. By using the "t" test, it was obtained to = 7.949 and then consulted with the table that is dk = 66 at a significant level of 5% = 1.99. Therefore, the obtained to be greater than t table is 7,949 the null hypothesis (Ho) is rejected and the alternative hypothesis (H1) is accepted. This proves that the Inquiry model is better than the Direct Instruction model of material objects and their properties. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Inquiry model is more effective than the Direct Instruction model of material objects and their properties the fifth grade students of SDN 101816 Pancur Batu academic year 2018/2019.

References

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2016. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta:Bumi Aksara.

________________. 2017. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta:

Rineka Cipta.

Hamdayama, Jumanta. 2016. Metodologi Pengajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Istarani dan Pulungan. 2015. Ekslopedia Pendidikan. Medan: Larispa.

Khoeriyah, Ni’matul. 2016. Pengaruh Model Direct Instruction Terhadap Hasil Belajar SBK

Materi Membuat Karya Kolase Siswa Kelas IV Sdn Gugus Kenanga Kabupaten Kebumen. Portal Garuda.

Kurniasih dan Sani. 2015. Ragam Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran untuk Peningkatan Profesionalitas Guru (Guru Inspiratif, Menjadi Guru Profesional, Pengembangan Model-Model Pembelajaran, Berbagai Macam Model Pembelajaran). Jakarta: Kata Pena.

Lubis, Asnarni. 2015. Statistik SPSS 23. Medan

Ngalimun. 2014. Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran.Yogyakarta : Aswaja Pressindo

Nurhayat. 2016. Perbandingan Model KooperatifTipe Two Stay Two Stray Dan Think Pair Share Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPS SiswaKelas V SD Negeri 10 Metro Pusat. Portal Garuda

Nuryanti,Yeti. 2016. Pengaruh Penggunaan Model Inkuiri Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Ranah Kognitif Siswa Kelas IV Sd Negeri 1 Kampung Baru. Portal Garuda.

Rohani. 2014.Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Melalui Strategi Pembelajaran Langsung (Direct Instruction) Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia SDN 167644 Kota Tebing Tinggi . Portal Garuda.

Rohmah, Ulfatun. 2013. Penerapan Metode Inkuiri Dalam Peningkatan Pembelajaran IPA Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. Portal Garuda.

Shoimin. 2014. 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013.Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Suardika. 2013. Pengaruh Perbedaan Antara Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Dan Model Pembelajaran Langsung Terhadap Penguasaan Konsep IPA Kelas V Di Gugus III. Portal Garuda.

Sudjana, Nana. 2016. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Sudijono, Anas. 2017. Pengantar Statistika Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

. 2016. Satistika untuk Penelitian. Bandung : Alfabeta

Susanto, Ahmad. 2012. Teori belajar & Pembelajaran di sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Tampubolon, Saur. 2014. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Sebagai Pengembangan Profesi Pendidik Dan Keilmuan. Jakarta : Erlangga.

Trianto. 2009. Mendasain Model - Model Pembelajaran Inovatif – Progresif.Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Undang- Undang Repbulik Indonesia. Nomor 20 Tahun 2003. Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Published

2019-04-30

How to Cite

KEMBAREN, A. K. B. (2019). PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL DIRECT INSTRUCTION DAN MODEL INKUIRI PADA MATA PELAJARAN IPA KELAS V SDN 101816 PANCUR BATU TAHUN PEMBELAJARAN 2018/2019. Jurnal Ilmiah Aquinas, 2(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.54367/aquinas.v2i1.358