PENGARUH BEBERAPA FAKTOR STATUS SOSIAL EKONOMI TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN KOPERASI CU CINTAKASIH TIGAPANAH KABUPATEN KARO

Authors

  • Anitha P. Tinambunan Fak Ekonomi, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54367/jmb.v20i1.692

Keywords:

Socio-Economic Status

Abstract

This study aims to 1. Determine whether the level of education, income and type of work has a positive and significant effect on the performance of the employees of the Cooperative CU Cinta Kasih Tigapanah Kab. Karo; 2. Knowing which factors are the most dominant influence on the performance of employees of the Cooperative CU Cinta Kasih Tigapanah Kab. Karo Data collection techniques carried out through interviews, documentation and questionnaires. The study population was all employees of the Cooperative CU Cinta Kasih Tigapanah Kab. Karo numbering 200 people (July 2019). The sampling technique uses Proportional Random Sampling where the research sample is taken from each work field in the Cooperative CU Cinta Kasih Tigapanah Kab.Karo. Based on the results of the F test it is known that the value of Fcount is 44,291> Ftable 3,145 with a significance level of 0,000 <0.05 so that the decision H0 is taken and H1 is accepted. This means that the level of education, income and type of work have a positive and significant effect simultaneously on the performance of CU Cinta Kasih Tigapanah Cooperative Employees. Karo Based on the t test, it is known that the most dominant type of work influences the performance of CU Cooperative Staff of Kasih Kasih Tigapanah, Kab. Karo, with a significance level of 0.008. Correlation coefficient (R) of 0.824. This means that the level of education, income and type of work has a very strong correlation (because the value is between 0.75 - 0.99) on the performance of the Cooperative Employees of CU Cinta Kasih Tigapanah, Kab. Karo The coefficient of determination (R Square) of 0.678 means that Employee Performance can be explained by the Level of Education, Income and Type of Work at 67.80% while 32.20% is influenced by other factors of socioeconomic status that are not included in this study such as: work experience , number of dependents, ownership status, type of residence and status in the community.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Anitha P. Tinambunan, Fak Ekonomi, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas

Dosen Tetap UNIKA Santo Thomas

References

Abdulsyani. 2007. Sosiologi Skematika, Teori dan Terapan, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.

Basrow dan Siti Juariyah. 2010. Analisis Kondisi Sosial Ekonomi dan Tingkat Pendidikan Masyarakat Desa Sriganding, Kecamatan Labuhan Maringgai, Kabupaten Lampung Timur

Damsar. 2000. Sosiologi Ekonomi. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta

Febriyenti, 2015. Pengaruh Kompensasi dan Motivasi terhadap Kinerja Karyawan pada Koperasi Manunggal Jaya Kec. Murara Tembesi, Kabupaten Batang Hari. Tugas Akhir Program Magister. Universitas Terbuka. http://repository.ut.ac.id

Gumilar, R. Muhammad Akbar. 2018. Pengaruh Gaji dan Masa Kerja terhadap Kinerja Karyawan pada PT Infomesia Nusantara Bandung. Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Prodi Manajemen Universitas Pasundan Bandung. Skripsi.

(http://repository.unpas.ac.id/38321/1/CD wisuda.pdf) Diakses 15 Juni 2019

Gunawan Wijaya. 2000. Jual Beli. Grafindo Persada. Jakarta.

Hasibuan. Malayu. S.P. 2003. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.

Jenkins G. D. Mitra, A. Gupta, N. & Shaw, J. D. 2013. Are Financial Incentives Related to Performance? A Meta-Analytic Review of Empirical Research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 777-787.

Lilik. 2007. Human Capital Competencies, Cetakan 1. Elex Media Komputindo. Jakarta.

Mangkunegara, Anwar Prabu. 2004. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung

Mathis, Robert L dan Jackson, Jhon H. 2012. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Buku 2. Salemba Empat. Jakarta.

Mulyadi. 2013. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Ghalia Indonesia, Bandung.

Munaldus et.al. 2013. Credit Union Koperasi. How to Grow & Sustain. Elex Media Komputindo, Jakarta.

Prawirosentono, Suyadi. 2008. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Kebijakan Kinerja Karyawan. BPFE Yogyakarta.

Riani. Asri Laksmi 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Masa Kini. Graha Ilmu. Yogyakarta.

Rivai Veithzal & Basri A.F.M. 2005. Performance Appraisal. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta

Sajogyo. 2003. Golongan Miskin dan Partisipasi dalam Pembangunan Desa. Prisma No .3. Yogyakarta.

Salim, Agus. 2006. Paradigma Penelitian Sosial. Tiara Wacana, Yogyakarta.

Santrock. 2007. Status Sosial Ekonomi. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.

Soekanto Soerjono. 2007. Sosiologi, Suatu Pengantar. Raja Grafindo. Jakarta.

Sudarsonohttps://jurnal.ugm.ac.id>article>view

Sugiyono. 2008. Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Alfabeta. Bandung.

Sumardi, M. 2004. Status Ekonomi Sosial. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.

Sutrisno, Edi. 2009. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi V Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.

Tan, M. 2011. Mengembangkan dan Menguji Perubahan Konseptual Tentang Relativitas. Grafindo. Jakarta.

Trisnawati Katarina Ice. 2014. Pengaruh Pelatihan Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan pada CU Mura Kopa di Kecamatan Sekayam Kabupaten Sanggau.

http://jurnal.untan.ac.id>download.pdf

UU SISDIKNAS No 20 Tahun 2003

Wirawan. 2009. Evaluasi Kinerja Sumber Daya Manusia, Teori, Aplikasi dan Penelitian. Salemba Empat. Jakarta.

Yasin Muhammad & Joko Priyono. 2016. Analisis faktor usia, gaji dan beban tanggungan terhadap produksi home industri sepatu di Sidoarjo (Studi kasus di Kecamatan Krian). Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis vol. 1, No. 1. hal. 95-120, Maret 2016.http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/publik/UNIMED-Undergraduate-22748 diakses Rabu, 12 Juni 2019.,http://eprints.umum.ac.id/37053/3/jiptummpp-gdl-fitriaherm-50780-3-babii.pdf) diakses Sabtu, 6 Juli 2019

Published

2020-05-31

How to Cite

Tinambunan, A. P. (2020). PENGARUH BEBERAPA FAKTOR STATUS SOSIAL EKONOMI TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN KOPERASI CU CINTAKASIH TIGAPANAH KABUPATEN KARO. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 20(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.54367/jmb.v20i1.692

Issue

Section

Artikel