AN ERROR ANALYSIS ON SUBJECT-VERB AGREEMENT IN CONSTRUCTING SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE MADE BY THE SECOND SEMESTER STUDENTS OF LAW FACULTY

Authors

  • Meikardo Samuel Prayuda FKIP, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan

Abstract

This research was aimed to find out the subject-verb agreement error made by the second semester students of Law Faculty UNIKA Santo Thomas. From the findings, 27% of the instruments answered by the students were identified error. There were 4 kinds of error made by the students in constructing subject-verb agreement. They were omission error, addition error, misformation error, and misordering error. In omission error, there were 26 errors occurred. In addition error, there were 5 errors occurred. In misformation error, there were 54 errors occurred. In misordering error, there was 1 error occurred. Among all of the errors that had been identified, misformation error was the most dominan error faced by the students. Based on the analysis, the possible cause of error was because of the students did not understand well about the construction of the simple present tense mastery. Although only 27% instrument was identified error, it was considered that the students’ lack of knowledge in structure could give serious impact to their writing. It was suggested that the students need to enrich their knowledge at least in the mastery of the simple present tense, specially in the construction of subject-verb agreement. In other hand, the faculty need to make extra class for the English subject to give the students more chance to enhance their English knowledge. This would support the vision of UNIKA Santo Thomas in achieving International Level University.

References

Arikunto, S. 2006. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Penilitian Pendidikan Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

As’ari, M.Y. 2013. An Error Analysis on Subject-Verb Agreement of Written English by 11th

Grade Students of Man 3 Tulungagung. Universitas Brawijaya. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FIB Vol 2, No 3

Belmont and Sharkey. 2011. The Easy Writer: Formal Writing for Academic Purposes, 3rdEdition. Australia.

Brown, D.H. 1980. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. United States of America.

Brucem, I. 2008. Academic Writing and Genre. New York.

Chandler, D. 2000. An Introduction to Genre Theory. Australia.

Devitt, A. 2004. Writing Genres.Southern Illinois University.

Elder, S. 2009. ILO school to work transition survey: A methodological guide. International Labour Organization.

Handcock and Gile. August 2011. On the Concept of Snowball Sampling.England.

Khansir, A.A. May 2012. Error Analysis and Second Language Acquisition. Finland.

Knapp and Watkins. 2005. Genre, Text, Grammar. Australia: University of New South Wales.

Llach, A.P.M. 2011. Lexical Errors and Accuracy in Foreign Language Writing. Ireland: Trinity College.

Mali, Y.C.G. 2012. Students’ Subject-Verb Agreement Errors in Paragraph Writing Class. LLT

Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching Vol 15, No 2

Mertens, N. 2010. Writing: Processes, Tools, and Techniques. New York: Nova Science Publisher.

Rizka, H and Hidayati, N.N. 2015. Mega Bank of Grammar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press.

Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Administrasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suprapto. 2013. Metodologi Pendidikan: Ilmu pendidikan dan Ilmu-Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial. Jakarta: PT. Buku Seru.

Wahyudi, Ribut (2012) Error analysis on subject-verb agreement: The case of a University Student in Indonesia. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 2 (4). pp. 20-25. ISSN 2224-5766

Published

2021-03-16

Issue

Section

Artikel