BORU NI RAJA HATOBAN "Tinjauan Filsafat Anthropologis atas Kaum Perempuan di dalam Budaya Batak Toba"

Authors

  • Serpulus T Simamora Filsafat, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas

Keywords:

budaya Batak Toba, status paradoksal, boru ni raja, marga, perempuan Batak Toba, patriarkal.

Abstract

One of many definitions offered to explain human existence is that humanbeing is a paradoxal being. By paradoxical being one intends that the veryexistence of human being is perceived in its seemingly contradictoryexpression without being contradiction. Human being is materialspiritual,individual-social, etc. This paradoxical nature constitutes humanexistence. It affects essentially his/her personality, religion, act, culture,etc. Social status of women in Toba Batak culture is placed in suchparadoxical situation too. In one hand, they are invoked as “Boru niRaja†(the honored daughter), but on the other hand, they are treated as“hatoban†(slaves). This article seeks to show critically the place of TobaBatak women in Toba Batak culture. Our purpose, therefore, is to presentthe social status of Toba Batak women inherited culturally fromancestors. By critically we mean that we seek to present fairly the socialstatus of women in both its negative side and positive one.

Author Biography

Serpulus T Simamora, Filsafat, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas

Filsafat, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas

References

ADINOLFI, M., “La Donna nel Pensiero e nella Vita di Gesùâ€, dalam G. GENNARO, ed., L’Antropologia Biblica, Napoli: Edizioni Dehoniani

, 717-751.

BABOLIN, S., Produzione di senso: Introduzione alla filosofia della cultura,

Roma: Editrice Pontificia Universita Gregoriana 1993.

BUDIMAN, A., Pembagian Kerja Secara Seksual. Sebuah Pembahasan

Sosiologis tentang Peranan Wanita di dalam Masyarakat, Jakarta:

Gramedia 1982.

GÖSSMANN, E., “The Construction of Women’s Difference in the Christian

Theological Traditionâ€, dalam Concilium 6 (1991) 50-59.

HARAHAP, B.M. − SIAHAAN, H.M., Orientasi Nilai-nilai Budaya Batak:

Suatu Pendekatan terhadap Perilaku Batak Toba dan Angkola-Mandailing,

Jakarta: Sanggar Willem Iskandar 1987.

HÉBRARD, M., “Les Femmes dans L’Église. Une Réalité qui Insisteâ€, LumiÄ“re e vie 182 (1987) 17-27.

HUTAGALUNG, W., Adat taringot tu Ruhut-ruhut Pardongansaripeon di

Halak Batak, Djakarta: NV Pusaka 1963.

LOEB, E.M., Sumatra. Its History and People, Kuala Lumpur: Bangunan Loke Yew 1972.

Serpulus Simamora, Boru ni Raja Hatoban

MAHMOUD, A. Al‘Akkad, Wanita dalam Al-Quran, Jakarta: Bulan Bintang

MALONEY, L.M., “The Argument for Women’s Difference in Classical

Philosophy and Early Christianityâ€, Concilium 6 (1991) 41-49.

MEYER-WILMES, H., “Excessive Violence against Women in the Name of

Religionâ€, Concilium 4 (1997) 55-63.

MONDIN, B., Antropologia filosofica. Filosofia della cultura e

dell’educazione, V, Bologna: Edizione Studio Domenicano 2000.

SIMAMORA, T.S., “Mengarungi Wilayah Seluas Segala Kenyataan.

Peziarahan Ilmiah Bersama Adelbert Snijdersâ€, Media Unika 13/36 (2001)

-70.

SINAGA, A.B., Citra Insan Batak bagi Modernisasi. Sumbangan Penyesuaian Adat Batak bagi Pembangunan Modern, Sibolga ttp., tth.

SINGLES, D., “La Différence. Destin ou Projet?â€, LumiÄ“re e vie 194 (1989) 59-70.

SORMIN, P., Adat Batak dohot Hakristenon, Pematangsiantar: Firma Parda, 1961.

TARIGAN, T.E. − TAMBUNAN, E., Struktur dan Organisasi Masyarakat

Toba, Ende-Flores: Nusa Indah 1974.

VERGOUWEN, J.C., Masyarakat dan Hukum Adat Batak, Jakarta: Pustaka

Azet 1985.

WELZER-LANG, Daniel., “Le Brouillage des Signesâ€, LumiÄ“re e vie 194

(1989) 15-22.

WERTHEIM, W.F., “Indonesian Society in Transitionâ€, dalam A. BÉTEILLE ,

ed., Social Inequality, Middlesex: Penguin Books Ltd. 1970, 193-212.

Published

2008-06-20

How to Cite

Simamora, S. T. (2008). BORU NI RAJA HATOBAN "Tinjauan Filsafat Anthropologis atas Kaum Perempuan di dalam Budaya Batak Toba". LOGOS, 1(1), 1–19. Retrieved from https://ejournal.ust.ac.id/index.php/LOGOS/article/view/211