PENGEMBANGAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR TINGKAT TINGGI BERBASIS STRATEGI METAKOGNITIF PROBLEM SOLVING PADA SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR DI KLATEN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54367/aquinas.v4i1.1001Keywords:
Higher order thinking skills, metacognitive and problem solving.Abstract
Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh kemampuan siswa dalam berpikir logis dan rasional masih rendah sedangkan era globalisasi menuntut adanya persaingan antar negara dalam berbagai aspek kehidupan termasuk sumber daya manusia. Kualitas sumber daya manusia bukan saja akan menentukan kemajuan suatu negara tetapi juga menjadi penentu daya saing antar bangsa. Kondisi demikian mendorong bidang pendidikan didesain untuk mampu membekali siswa yang tanggap terhadap tantangan era globalisasi. Untuk menghadapi tantangan tersebut, maka perlu melatih siswa agar mampu belajar secara mandiri dan berkembang kemampuan bernalar serta berpikirnya. Hal ini sejalan dengan tujuan pembelajaran dari sekolah dasar yaitu membentuk manusia intelektual, mampu memecahkan permasalahan serta mampu berpikir/bernalar. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian membuktikan bahwa penggunaan strategi metakognitif problem solving merupakan alternatif strategi pembelajaran yang dipertimbangkan dan mampu mengembangkan keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa. Hal ini ditunjukkan dari skor rerata skor tes awal adalah 27,94; rerata skor akhir 71,54, dan N-Gain 61 (100%) dalam kategori sedang.References
Akkaya, N. 2011. Effect of Using Reading Comprehension Strategies on the Attitude and Success at Elementary School 8th Grade Turkish Course. Student Attitudes (47-57). Upper Galilee: Nova Publisher.
Aljaberi, N. M. 2015. University Student's Level of Metacognitive Thinking and Their Ability to Solve Problems. American International Journal of Contemporary Research. vol, 5, No 3; Juni 2015.
Anderson, D. & Nashon, S. 2006. Predators of Knowledge Construction: Interpreting Students’Metacognition in an Amusement Park Physics Program.
Anderson, Lorin W & Krathwohl, David R. 2001. Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman; NY.
Aprianti, Vika. 2013. Pengaruh Penerapan Model Cooperative Learning Tipe Think Pair Share (TPS) Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa pada Pembelajaran Ekonomi. UPI. repository.upi.edu.
Asay & Schneider, EW. 1976. The Effect of Untrainned Student Generated Highlighting on Learning. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Northestern Educational Research Association ,Ellensville,New York.
Bransford, J., Sherwood, R., Vye, N., & Rieser, J. 1986. Teaching Thinking and Problem Solving: Researchfoundations. American Psychologist , 41 (10), 1078.
Carlson, M. P. & Bloom, I. 2005. The Cyclic Nature of Problem Solving: An emergent Multidimensional Problem Solving framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(1). 45- 75.
Duch, B. J. 2001. The Power of Problem Based Learning. Virginia: Stylus Publishing.
Edmondson, K.M, 1994 Concept maps and teh development of cases for problem based learning, Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 69 (2), 1994 108-110
Flavell, J. 1976 Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911
Flavell, J. H. 1981. Monitoring social cognitive enterprises: Something else that may develop in the area of social cognition. In J. H. Flavell & L. Ross (Eds.), Social cognitive development: Frontiers and possible futures (pp. 272-287). New York:: Cambridge University Press.
Friend, R. 2001. Teaching Summarization as a Content Area Reading Strategy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy.44 (4). 320.
Gok, T. 2010. The General Assessment of Problem Solving Processes in Physics Educatioon. Gok,
Hafid, Abdul. 2007. Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Melalui Teknik Problem Solving. Jurnal Iktiyar, Vol. 5, No. 3, Issn 1412-8535, hal 126-277.
Hake & Richard, R. 2002. Relationship of Individual Student Normalized Learning Gains in Mechanics with Gender, HighSchool Physics, and Pretest Scores on Mathematics and Spatial Visualization. Tersedia: http://www.physics.indiana. edu/~hake. [21 September 2008].
Hattie. J 2009. Visible Learning; A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta Analyses Relating to Achivement, Routledge, Oxon, New York.
Henk, W.A., & Stahl, N,A 1985. A meta-analysis of the effect of notetaking on learning from lecture. ERIC Document Reproduction Services No.258b533. Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University.
Heong, Y. M. 2011. The Level of Marzano Higher Order Thinking Skills Among Technical Education Students. International Journal of Social and humanity , Vol. 1,No. 2, July 2011, 121-125.
Hollingworth, R. & McLoughlin. 2002. The Development of Metacognitive Skilss among Firts Year Science Student. Tersedia http://fyhe.Qut.Edu.au./FYHE- Previous/Papers/HollingworthPaper.doc.
Jitendra, A., & Gajria, M. 2010. Reading comprehension instruction for students with learning disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children., 43 (8), 1-13.
Kiewra K A, & Fletcher, HJ. 1984. The relationship between levels of note-taking and achivement. Human Learning, 3, 273-280.
Kirkgoz.Y. 2010. Promoting students’ note taking skills through task-based learning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science (2) 4346-4351
Kuhn, D. 2000. Theory of Mind, Metacognition and Reasoning: A life-span Perspective. In P. Mitchell & K. J. Riggs (Eds.). Children’s Reasoning and The Mind (pp. 301–326). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Leutwyer, B. 2009. Metacognitive Learning Strategies: Differential Development Patterns in High School, Metacognitive Learning 4:111-123
Mason, C.L (1992) Concept mapping : A tool to develop reflective science instruction, Science Education 76 (1) 51-63 , John Wiley and Son
Limbach. B & Waugh.W. 2009. Developing Higher Level Thinking. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies: Chadron State College.
Longman, D. & Atkinson, R. 1999. College Learning and Study Skills. USA: Wadsworth/ Thopmson Learning.
Mayer, R. 1998. Cognitive, Metacognitive, and Motivational Aspets of Problem Solving. Instructional science. 26 (1-2), 49-63.
Novak, J.D, Gowin, B.D, Johansen, G.T. 1984. The use of concept mapping and knowledge vee mapping with junior high school science students. Science Education. 67 (5) 625-645.
Nurdin, Syafrududdin, Adriatoni. 2016. Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
O'Neil, H.F., & Schacter, J. 1997. Test Specifications for Problem Solving Assessment. Center for the Study of Evaluation, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing. Graduate Schoolof Education & Information Studies. University of California: Los Angeles.
Ponce. C.W. 2000. Summarization instruction:Efects on foreign comprehension and summarization of expository texts’. Literacy Research and Instruction. 39 (4) 329-350J.
Riyadi, Iswan. 2010. Pembelajaran Berbasis Metakognisi untuk Peningkatan Kompetensi Siswa. Disertasi. UPI: Bandung.
Rokhman, Ayla Yuli. 2014. Perbandingan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning dan Problem Solving Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Pada Materi Pelestarian Lingkungan Hidup Siswa XI IPS MAN 3 Malang.Skripsi. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.
Sudiarta, P. 2006. Pengembangan model pembelajaran berorientasi pemecahan masalah open-ended berbantuan LKM untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dan hasil belajar siswa matakuliah pengantar dasar Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran UNDIKSHA 39 Nomor 2, April 2006. Singaraja: UNDIKSHA.
Sudjana. I.W. 2012. Pengaruh Jenis Pendekatan Pembelajaran dan Tingkat Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Terhadap Perolehan Belajar IPS pada Siswa Kelas VI SD 17 Dauh Puri Denpasar. Tesis. Malang: PPS UM.
Sudjimat, D.A. 1996. Pembelajaran Pemecahan Masalah. Tinjauan Singkat Berdasar Teori Kognitif. Jurnal Pendidikan Himaniora dan Sains @ (1&2). hlm. 24-32.
Susan, Imel. 2002. Metacognitive Skills for Adult Learnin. (online). HYPERLINK http://www.ce-" (http://www.ce te.org/ acve/docs/tia00107.pdf. Diakses 3 September 2012.
Tan, O. S. 2004. Enhanching Thinking Problem Based Learning Approached. Singapura: Thomson.
Vaidya, S. R. 1999. Metacognitive Learning Strategies for Students with Learning Disabilities. Education, 120 (1), 186-191.
Veenman, M. V. Nad Span. 2005. The Assement of Matacognitive Skill: What can be Learned from Multi – Method Design. Metacognition Learning 4. 235-251
Wikefiel, J.F. 1992. Creative Thinking: Problem Solving Skill and The Arts Orientation. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Coorporation.Wiley InterScience.
Woolfolk, A. 2008. Educational Psychology Active earn- ing Edition 10th ed. Pearson Education, Inc.
Woolley, G. 2010. Developing reading comprehension: combining visual and verbal cognitive processes. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy. 33(2), 108-125.
Wormeli, R. 2004. Summarization in any Subjects: 50 techniques to improve student learning. Alexaandria, VA USA: Association for supervision & Curriculum Development.
