PERSELISIHAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL AKIBAT PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA  DI PT TORGANDA MEDAN (Studi Kasus Putusan Perkara Nomor 263/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2021/PN. Medan)

Yohanes Suhardin; Serilus Sapardi Duha

Authors

Yohanes Suhardin Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas, Medan
Serilus Sapardi Duha Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas

Keywords:

IIndustrial Relations Disputes, Termination of Employment, Normative Rights

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out the consideration of the Panel of Judges at the Industrial Relations Court (PHI), at the Medan District Court which stated that the actions of PT. Torganda is an act that violates Article 156 paragraph (4) letter b of Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower and to find out the legal consequences against PT. Torganda who terminated the employment relationship. The legal research method used is a normative legal research method that uses secondary data as the main data source. Secondary data collection is carried out by document study, namely research conducted by looking for data in the form of case verdict Number 263/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2021/PN/Mdn. The data obtained is processed and analyzed qualitatively, juridically, normatively. Conclusions are drawn by an inductive method, meaning that the author draws conclusions from specific to general. The results of this study explain that the Termination of Employment (PHK), carried out by PT. Torganda as Defendant I, and PT. Togos Gopas as Defendant II, against Nancy Ardhina Tambun as Plaintiff. The layoffs carried out by the Defendants are an act that violates Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower, as stated in the consideration of the Panel of Judges. Then the legal consequences for the parties in the decision of case Number 263/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2021/PN/Mdn regarding industrial relations disputes regarding termination of employment. The Defendants were sanctioned with severance and severance to pay the Plaintiff's normative rights in cash and at once.

References

BUKU

Ashadie, Zaeni, Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Bidang Hubungan Kerja, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta 2007.

Ashadie, Zaeni, dan Rahmawati Kusuma Hukum Ketenagakerjaan dalam teori &

praktik di Indonesia, Penerbit Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2019.

Kertonegoro, Sentanoe, Hubungan Industrial, Hubungan Antara Pengusaha dan Pekerja (Bipartit), dan Pemerintah (Tripartit), Jakarta, Yayasan Tenaga Kerja Indonesia.

Soepomo, Iman, Pengantar Hukum Perburuhan, Cetakan ke-9, Penerbit Djambatan, Jakarta, 2019.

Simanjuntak, Payaman, Manajemen Hubungan Industrial, Jala Permata Akasara, 2019

R. Subekti, KUHPerdata, Cet. Ke-43, PT. Balai Pustaka (Persero), Mantraman Jakarta Timur, 2017.

Soekanto, Soerjono, Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2003.

PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN

Putusan Nomor. 263/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2021/PN.Medan

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Pasal 27 ayat (2)

Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan

Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 tentang penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial

Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung SEMA No. 3 Tahun 2015

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 35 Tahun 2021 Tentang Perjanjian kerja waktu tertentu, Alih daya, Waktu kerja dan Waktu istirahat, dan Pemutusan

Hubungan Kerja

JURNAL

Auqa, N. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Putusan Nomor 4/Pdt. Sus-Phi/2019/Pn-Bna Tentang Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa

Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, 5(3).

Budiono Rachmad Abdul, Makna Perintah Sebagai Salah Satu Unsur Hubungan Kerja Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan, Artikel 2012, (http://arenahukum.ub.ac.id.)