DEKOMPOSISI TRADED SPREAD SAHAM DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA: ORDER PROCESSING COST, INVENTORY HOLDING COST, DAN ADVERSE SELECTION COST
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54367/jmb.v16i1.121Keywords:
Traded Spread, Order Processing Cost, Inventory Holding Cost, Adverse Selection Cost.Abstract
Stock market performance can be viewed from various aspects. One of this aspect is the amount of traded spread. The greater of traded spread can be caused by a lack of trading system and disclosure. Therefore, the decomposition of traded spread is important for the study. This research was conducted to develop a model of traded spread and prove that: the order processing cost, inventory holding cost, and adverse selection cost are the component of traded spread. To achieve these objectives, the stock price and order flow observed during the years 2007 - 2008 and using the purposive sampling as the sampling technique. Samples were observed at 1.782 and using trade indicators to determine whether the transactions undertaken based on the ask price or bid price. The data were analyzed using the multiple regression. The research indicated that: First, the model of traded spread can be used to explain the decomposition of traded spread. Second, the contribution of order processing cost is 29 per cent, the contribution of inventory holding cost is 68 per cent, and the contribution of adverse selection cost is 3 percent. Third, the contribution of adverse selection cost is relatively low when compared with the contribution of real spread. Furthermore, the results of this study can be used to determine the policies in reducing of traded spread.Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /opt/lampp/htdocs/ojs/plugins/generic/usageStats/UsageStatsPlugin.inc.php on line 788
Downloads
References
Ellis, K., R. Michaely and M. O’Hara, 2000, The Accuracy of Trade Classification Rules: Evidence from NASDAQ, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 35, 529 – 551.
Fuss, Roland, 2002, The Financial Characteristics between Emerging and Developed Equity Markets, Institute for General Economic Research, Department of Empirical Economic Research and Econometrics, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg.
George, Thomas J., Gautam Kaul and M. Nimalendran, 1991, Estimation of the Bid-Ask Spread and Its Components: A New Approach, Review of Financial Studies 4, 623 – 656.
Glosten, L., and L. Harris, 1988, Estimating the Component of the Bid/ask Spread, Journal of Financial Economics 21, 123 – 142.
Glosten, Lawrence and Paul Milgrom, 1985, Bid, Ask and Transaction Prices in a Specialist Market with Heterogeneously Informed Tradersâ€, Journal of Financial Economics 14, 71 – 100.
Hanousek, Jan and Richard Podpiera, 2002, Informed Trading and Bid-ask Spread: Evidence from an Emerging Market, Working paper, CERGE-EI, Czech Republic.
Hasbrouck, J. and D. Seppi, 2001, Common Factors in Prices, Order Flows, and Liquidity, Journal of Financial Economics 59, 383-411.
Heflin, Frank., Kenneth W. Shaw and John J. Wild, 2000, Disclosure Quality and Market Liquidity, Working paper, Purdue University.
Huang, R., dan H. Stoll, 1997, The Component of the Bid-ask Spread: A General Approach, Review of Financial Studies 10, 995 – 1034.
Institute for Economic and Financial Research, 2008, Indonesian Capital Market Directory.
Madhavan, A., M. Richardson, dan M. Roomans, 1997, Why Do Securities Prices Change ? A Transaction Level Analysis of NYSE-Listed Stocks, Review of Financial Studies 10, 1035 – 1064.
Roll, Richard, 1984, A Simple Implicit Measure of the Effective Bid-ask Spread in Efficient Market, Journal of Finance 39, 1127 – 1139.
Stoll, H. R., 2000, Friction, Journal of Finance 55, 1479 – 1514.
Stoll, Hans R., 1989, Inferring the Components of the Bid-ask Spread: Theory and Empirical Tests, Jounal of finance 44, 115 – 134.
