PENGARUH KOMPENSASI DAN LINGKUNGAN KERJA TERHADAP SEMANGAT KERJA PADA KOPDIT CU MANDIRI TEBING TINGGI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54367/jmb.v21i2.1410Keywords:
Compensation, Work Environment and Work SpiritAbstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of compensation and work environment on employee morale at the CU Mandiri Tebing Tinggi Kopdit. Benefits of Research: Provide information material to the management of CU Mandiri Tebing Tinggi Kopdit about the effect of compensation and work environment on employee morale and For other researchers it can be used as a reference in conducting studies or research with the same subject matter as well as input for interested parties directly with this research. The number of samples was 96 respondents, the method of collecting data was through questionnaires and documentation, the variables studied were about the effect of compensation and work environment on employee morale at the Cooperative Unit of CU Mandiri Tebing Tinggi partially and simultaneously on work morale and data analysis methods with multiple regression. The results showed the linear regression equation: Linear regression equation: SK = 0.558 + 0.797Kom + 0.448LK., indicating the regression coefficient of the compensation variable (Kom) and work environment (LK), which was positive, meaning that all variables had a positive influence on work morale. The correlation coefficient (R) = 0.886, which means that the relationship between the compensation variable (Kom) and the work environment (LK) on work morale is very strong. The coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.785 means that the variable compensation (Kom) and work environment (LK) is able to explain 78.5% of work morale, while 21.5% is influenced by other factors. The calculated t value of the compensation variable = 6.871 and the work environment = 3.273 > t table which shows a significance number of 0.000 < 0.05, then the two variables have a partially significant effect on work morale. The calculated F value = 83.058 > F table with a significance level of 0.000 < 0.05, then Ho is rejected and H1 is accepted, meaning that the compensation variable (Kom) and work environment (LK) have a significant effect simultaneously on work morale. Based on the conclusion above, it is better if the Cooperative of CU Mandiri Tebing Tinggi needs to increase the compensation provided and the work environment to encourage employee morale so as to create job satisfaction. , Judging from the value of the coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.785, it means that compensation and work environment variables are able to explain 78.5% of work spirit while 21.5% is influenced by other factors. Other factors that affect morale should be investigated from the internal and external environment.Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /opt/lampp/htdocs/ojs/plugins/generic/usageStats/UsageStatsPlugin.inc.php on line 788
Downloads
References
As’ad M. 2005. Psikologi Industri . Yogyakarta: Liberty
Brahmasari & Suprayetno.2008. Pengaruh Motivasi, Kepemimpinan dan Budaya Organisasi terhadap kepuasan kerja Karyawan serta Dampaknya pada Kinerja Perusahaan (Studi Kasus pada PT Pei Hai International Wiratama Indonesia) Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Vol. VII No. 2 Sepetember 2008.
Elvira sari, 2009. Pengaruh Kompensasi dan Iklim Organisasi terhadap Kepuasan Kerja. Bisnis & Birokrasi, Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi, Jan— Apr 2009, hlm. 18-24
Ghozali, Imam. 2003. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan SPSS. Edisi Kedua. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegora. Semarang.
Gunawan, Wibisana, 2001, Dasar — Dasar Manajemen, PT. Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.
Hakim, Abdul. 2006. Analisis Pengaruh Motivasi, Komitmen Organisasi Dan Iklim Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Pada Dinas Perhubungan Dan Telekomunikasi Propinvsi Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Riset Dan Bisnis Indonesia (JRBI). Vol. 2. No. 2. Juli. Hal. 165 – 180. Unnisula. Semarang.
Handoko, Hani. 2008. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta
Hasibuan, Malayu. 2008. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Penerbit PT. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta
Irianto & Dwiastuti. 2005. Analisis pengaruh iklim kerja dan semangat kerja terhadap kepuasan kerja (Studi kasus Kantor Sekretaris Daerah Pemerintah Kabupaten Demak). Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi, Vol. II tahun 2005
Indriantoro, Nur, dan Bambang Supomo. 1999. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis. BPFE. Yogyakarta
James A. F. Mathis. Alfonsus Jackson, 2006, Manajemen Jilid I, Edisi 8, Erlangga, Jakarta.
Karismawan, Alex. 2005. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. PT. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
Koesmono, Teman. 2005. Pengaruh Kempemimpinan, Motivasi, Pelatihan dan Lingkungan Kerja pada kinerja Karyawan Pada Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum Kota Surakarta. Volume XVII. Nomor 1. April. Hal. 79 — 92. STIE YKPN. Yogyakarta.
Mangkunegara, 2005. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. PT Erlangga : Jakarta
Munandar. 2004. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Erlangga : Jakarta.
Murdjianto. 2001. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bina Atmaja : Bandung.
Nitisemito, Andi. 2001. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. PT Erlangga: Jakarta
Notoatmodjo, Suyadi. 2001. Manajemen Kinerja Karyawan. BPFE Yogyakarta
Panuju, Agung. 2003. Pengaruh kompensasi dan karakteristik pekerjaan terhadap kepuasan kerja kagcrwan unit produkci produksi PT.X Palembang. Jurnal Manajemen & Bisnis Sriwijaya Vol. 1 No. 2, Oktober 2003
Panggabean, Mutiara S. 2004. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Cetakan Kedua. Ghalia Indonesia. Jakarta.
Purba, Ferry Allan. 2005. Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kepuasan Kerja Dan Peningkatannya. Jurnal Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Universitas Kristen Krida Wacana. Jakarta
Robbins, Stephen P. 2006. Perilaku Keorganisasian. Jilid 1 Edisi 10, PT Indeks Kelompok Gramedia. Jakarta.
Rivai, Veithzal dan Ella Juavani Sagala. 2008. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta
Simamora, Henry. 2002. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. STIE YKPN. Yogyakarta
Silvana, Budiatmo, 2002, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: BPFE. UGM.
Sutrisno, Edy 2008, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.
Sutrisno, Edy 2009, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.
Sugiyono. 2001. Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Alfabeta. Bandung