Tingkat Kepuasan Mahasiswa Terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Angkot di Kota Medan
Keywords:
kualitas pelayanan, angkot, mahasiswa, importance-performance analysisAbstract
In general, urban transportation experiences similar problem, which is the low level of public transport occupancy. There are numerous factors that can cause such condition, of which can be summarized in the form of service quality shortcoming. Service quality of such public facility is measured and evaluated based on user experience, and planners utilize it to plan for future improvements. Importance-Performance Analysis is used in this research to identify aspects of service that are expected to be on top of enhancement priority list. Based on 159 students’ responses, it was found that six service criterias are in high-priority-quadrant. These are crowding, sitting comfort, hygiene, driver behavior, driver cleanliness, and security. Specifically, driver behavior aspect is regarded as highly prioritized, whereas on the contrary angkot fare and operating time are considered good enough and thus placed on low-priority list.References
Dell’Olio, L., Ibeas, A., & Cecin, P. (2011). The quality of service desired by public transport users. Transport Policy, 18(1), 217-227.
Eboli, L., & Mazzulla, G. (2007). Service quality attributes affecting customer satisfaction for bus transit. Journal of public transportation, 10(3), 2.
Fellesson, M., & Friman, M. (2012, February). Perceived satisfaction with public transport service in nine European cities. In Journal of the Transportation Research Forum (Vol. 47, No. 3).
Hayes, B. E. (1998). Measuring customer satisfaction: Survey design, use, and statistical analysis methods. ASQ Quality Press.
Idris, Z. (2009). Kajian “Tingkat Kepuasan†Pengguna Angkutan Umum di DIY. Dinamika Teknik Sipil (Vol 9, No. 2).
Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. The journal of marketing, 77-79.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. the Journal of Marketing, 41-50.
Randheer, K., & Al-Motawa, A. A. (2011). Measuring commuters’ perception on service quality using SERVQUAL in public transportation. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 3(1), 21.
Redman, L., Friman, M., Gärling, T., & Hartig, T. (2013). Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: A research review. Transport Policy, 25, 119-127.
Setiawan, R. (2005). Analisa tingkat kepuasan pengguna kereta api komuter surabaya–sidoarjo. Simposium VIII FSTPT, Universitas Sriwijaya, 5-6.
Sever, I. (2015). Importance-performance analysis: A valid management tool?. Tourism Management, 48, 43-53.
Stradling, S. G., Anable, J., & Carreno, M. (2007). Performance, importance and user disgruntlement: A six-step method for measuring satisfaction with travel modes. Transportation Research Part A:
Policy and Practice, 41(1), 98-106.
Tyrinopoulos, Y., & Antoniou, C. (2008). Public transit user satisfaction: Variability and policy implications. Transport Policy,15(4), 260-272.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
JRKMS publishes fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the internet to all users immediately upon publication. Non-commercial use and distribution in any medium is permitted, provided the author and the journal are properly credited. Authors retain copyright to their work.
