Penerapan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Berbasis Kecerdasan Buatan Untuk Penentuan Prioritas Penerima Bantuan Pendidikan Menggunakan Pendekatan Hybrid AHP dan Decision Tree

Authors

  • Muhammad Iqbal Batubara Institut Bisnis dan Teknologi Al Washliyah, Tapanuli Tengah, Sumatera Utara
  • Safran Matondang Institut Bisnis dan Teknologi Al Washliyah, Tapanuli Tengah, Sumatera Utara
  • Andrian Irsyan Institut Bisnis dan Teknologi Al Washliyah, Tapanuli Tengah, Sumatera Utara
  • Hendra Sahputra Institut Bisnis dan Teknologi Al Washliyah, Tapanuli Tengah, Sumatera Utara
  • Anna Basriyani Institut Bisnis dan Teknologi Al Washliyah, Tapanuli Tengah, Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54367/means.v11i1.6589

Keywords:

Decision Support System, Artificial Intelligence, Analytical Hierarchy, Decision Tree, Educational Assistance

Abstract

Educational assistance distribution is one of the strategic efforts made by governments and educational institutions to improve equal access to education. However, in practice, the process of determining priority recipients often faces several problems, such as subjective assessment, inaccurate targeting, and limitations in processing complex and multidimensional criteria data. This condition creates an urgent need for the implementation of an objective, accurate, and adaptive decision support system based on artificial intelligence. This study aims to design and implement an artificial intelligence-based Decision Support System (DSS) to determine the priority recipients of educational assistance in a well-targeted manner. The approach used is a hybrid method combining the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Decision Tree. The AHP method is utilized to determine the importance weight of each assessment criterion, such as economic condition, academic achievement, number of dependents, and social status, based on a structured and consistent priority level. Furthermore, the Decision Tree algorithm is used to perform classification and make final decisions based on the weighted data patterns of assistance recipients.The research methodology includes the stages of data collection, determination of criteria and subcriteria, weight calculation using AHP, development of the Decision Tree classification model, and accuracy testing and validation of the system results. The system implementation is expected to produce recommendations for educational assistance recipients that are transparent, objective, and easy for policymakers to understand.

References

. Rahman et al., “Decision support systems in education sector: A systematic review,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 4211– 4235, 2021.

. S. Nugroho and R. Kurniawan, “Challenges in scholarship selection using manual assessment,” Journal of Educational Policy, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 87–95, 2020.

. M. Yusuf et al., “Equity issues in educational financial aid distribution,” Social Sciences Review, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 33–41, 2022.

. J. Han, M. Kamber, and J. Pei, Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, 4th ed. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2021.

. N. Hidayat et al., “AI-based decision support system for scholarship recipients,” Journal of Information Systems, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 201–210, 2021.

. L. Zhang et al., “Machine learning applications in educational decision making,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 113245–113257, 2021.

. T. L. Saaty, “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process,” International Journal of Services Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 83–98, 2020.

. S. Kotsiantis, “Decision trees: A recent overview,” Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 2907–2929, 2021.

. R. Wijaya et al., “Comparison of MCDM methods for scholarship selection,” Journal of Applied Informatics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 55–64, 2022.

. A. Prasetyo and D. Lestari, “Implementation of SAW and TOPSIS for educational aid selection,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 197, pp. 512– 519, 2022.

. M. I. Batubara, “Academic chatbot based on natural language processing for student services at STMIK Mulia Darma,” International Journal of Informatics and Computer Science (IJICS), vol. 9, pp. 116–120, 2025.

. M. A. Hossain et al., “Hybrid AHP and machine learning models for decision support,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 189, 2022.

. F. Ahmad et al., “Interpretable decision tree models in public policy,” IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 742–751, 2022.

. K. Putri et al., “Transparency and accountability in educational aid systems,” Journal of Public Administration, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2023.

. S. Chen et al., “Explainable AI for decision support systems,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 566–64, 2023.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

How to Cite

Batubara, M. I., Matondang, S. ., Irsyan, A. ., Sahputra, H. ., & Basriyani, A. . (2026). Penerapan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Berbasis Kecerdasan Buatan Untuk Penentuan Prioritas Penerima Bantuan Pendidikan Menggunakan Pendekatan Hybrid AHP dan Decision Tree. MEANS (Media Informasi Analisa Dan Sistem), 11(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.54367/means.v11i1.6589

Issue

Section

Daftar Artikel

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.