THE APPLICATION OF CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS THE CASE OF LEARNING LATIN LANGUAGE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54367/kairos.v5i2.1449Abstract
This paper tries to answer the question whether or not the Contrastive Analysis Theory can be applied in the methodology of teaching all languages universally. Some linguists and methodologists of teaching such as Lado, Fries, Lee, Corder, Stockwell and Martin, claimed that this theory is applicable in teaching second or foreign language. This paper will argue that it is not, and it will be supported with an example of the case I learning Latin language.References
Brown, H.Douglas.1987. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New
Jersey: Prentice-Hall
Corder, S.Pt.1967. The Significance of Learner’s Errors, in International Review of
Applied Linguistics, 5: 161-170
Fries, Charles C.1945.Teaching and Learning English as a Foreign Language.
Ann Arbor: University Michigan Press
Dulay, Heidi, et.al 1982. Language Two. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, Rod.1986. Understanding Second Language Acquisition. London: Oxford
University Press.
Lado, Rober.1957. Linguistics Across Culture. New York: The University Press.
Selinker,Larry.1972. Interlanguage, in Brown.
Sridar, S.N.1980. Contrastive Analysis, Error Analysis and Interlanguage : Three
Phases of One Goal, in Kenneth Croft (ed) Readings on English as a Second
Language. Massachusetts: Winthrop Publishers, Inc.
Winamaja, S.J.1964. Elementa Linguae Latinae. Surabaya: PN.Karya Tjotas.
