ERROR ANALYSIS IN USING SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE IN DESCRIPTIVE PARAGRAPHS MADE BY THE SEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP KATOLIK TRISAKTI 1 MEDAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54367/kairos.v3i2.830Abstract
This research method used a case study method. The subject of this included the Seventh Grade Students of SMP Katolik Trisakti 1 Medan. Which is comprised of 30 stusents. In analysis the datan the writer collected the data from the students identifiedthe grammatical errors, classified the errors of using simple present tense in the students’ descriptive paragraph to determine the frequency of errors, and calculated the data into percentages. The data by using formula:P= fnx100% P= Percentage, F= Frequency of error made, N= Total of students’ errors.the data was taken from the test: it was written test. The result demonstrate that the students’ errors can be categorized into four kinds of errors. Which include 14,7% errors of omission, 6,7% errors of additon, 73,3% errors in misformation and 5% error in misordering. The writer observed 218 total errors. The witer concluded that misformation was the dominant kind of errors Made by the Seventh Grade of SMP Katolik Trisakti 1 Medan. The teacher recommended practicing grammatical rules in Simple Present Tense in order to minimize the errors. Morever, other researchers can provide techniques in increase students’ mastery of simple present tense.References
Anderson, G & Arsenault, N. 2005. Fundamentals of Education Research. London: Routledge.
Anderson, G & Arsenault, N. 2005. Fundamentals of Education Research. London: Routledge.
Ari, D et. al. 1962. Introduction to Research In Education. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Azar, B S.1999.Fundamentals of English Grammar. New Jersey : Prentice Hall.
Azar, BS.1941. Fundamental of English Grammar (Second Edition). New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.
Brown, H D. 1980. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Brown, H D. 2006. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (Fifth Edition). New York: Oearsib Education.
Corder, S P. 1981. Error Analysis and Interlanguage. Walton Street : Oxford University Press.
Cramer, D. 2003. Advanced Qualitative Data Analysis. NewYork:Open University Press.
Dulay, B. et al. 1982. Language two. New york : D’Etudhes Theologiques.
Hornby, A S.1975. Guide to Patterns and Usage in English (Second Edition). Hongkong: University Press.
Jabbary, M J. 2013. Time and Tense in Language. International Journal of Linguistics, 5 (5), 243-252.
James, C. 1996. Error in Language Learning and Use. New York : Wesly Longman.
Norrish, J. 1983. Language Learning and Their Errors. London : Macmillan Publisher.
Oshima, A. and Hogue, A. 1981. Writing Academic Engish. New York: Addison Wesly Publishing company.
Rusmanhaji. 2004. Kinds of Genre. Surabaya : Elevent March University.
Schole, R. 1985. Literary Theory and The Teaching of English. San Fransisco : University Press.
Shaw, H. 1969. Errors in English and Ways To Correct Them. New York: University Press.
Thomson, A J. and Martinet A V. 1985. A Practical English Grammar (Lates Edition). London:University Press.
Wilkinson, D and Birmingham, P. 2003. Using Research Instruments : A Guide for Researchers. New York: Psychology Press.
Yosi, F P. 1982. An Error Analysis in using Simple Present Tense in Descriptive Paragraphs made by the Seventh Grade Students of SMP Negeri 3 Malang. Unpublished Sarjana’s Thesis, Faculty of Teachers Training and Education: Sanata Dharma. University Malang.
