IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION BY USING PQ4R STRATEGY TO THE EIGHTH GRADE AT SMP NEGERI 2 PANCUR BATU

Authors

  • Sartika Margaret Br Rajagukguk FKIP, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan
  • Karisma E. Tarigan FKIP, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan
  • Fiber Yun A. Ginting FKIP, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan

Abstract

 Reading is one of the four language skills in English, they are listening, speaking, reading and writing. The students get bored in reading comprehension. Since they do not understand the text. Thus, they need some ways or strategy which could help students’s reading comprehension on narrative text. The teacher should be creative to search for interesting strategy to teach reading comprehension on narrative text. PQ4R strategy can helps the students to understand on narrative text. The objectives of this study to find out the students’ reading comprehension bu using PQ4R strategy. The subject of this study were the eight grade students of SMP 2 Negeri Pancur Batu. This research, the writer used Classroom Action Research (CAR) as the method of research. Tests were used to gather the quantitative data. Based on the finding of this study, it showed in pre-test only 4 students (11%) who passed KKM ( the Mastery Minimum Criteria), and  post test 25 students (71%). The result of this research revealed that there was a significant improvement of the students’ achievement from the pre-test to in the post test. This improvement was shown by the comparison between the mean score of pre-test (51,2), and post test (73,82). Furthermore, the students were interested in PQ4R strategy, it can be seen from the result of observation sheet and questionnaire .Therefore, PQ4R startegy was effective strategy in helping students to improve their reading comprehension especially in narrative text.

References

Ahuja, Pramila. 2007. Communication Skills: How to Increase Your Reading Speed. New Delhi: Sterling Publisher.

Al, Talal. Abd.,&Hameed, Al, Odwan. 2012. The Effect of The Directed Reading Thinking Activity through Cooperative Learning on English Secondary Stage Students’ Reading Comprehension inJordan. International Journal Humanities and Social Science, 2(16).

Allen, Jannet. 2008. More Tools for Teaching Content Literacy. Virginia: Stenhouse.

Anderson, Mark, & Anderson, Kathy. 1997. Text Types in English. Sidney: Macmilan Education Australia. PTY. LTD.

Ayres, Edward, L. 2008. Narrative Text. New York: Oxford University Press.

Best, John, N., & Khan, James, V. 2002. Research in Education. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India.

Bonner, Margaret. 1994.Step Into Writing. London: Longman.

Bower, Gordon. H. 1975. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Researh and Theory. New York: Academic Press.

Brown, Doughlas. 2003. Language Assessment Principle and Classroom Practices. Chicago: Longman.

Brunner, Judy. T. 2013.Doing What Works: Literacy Strategies for the Next Level. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publisher.Inc.

Burns, Anne. 1984. Teaching English In Today’s Elementary Schools. Third edition. Boston : Houngthon Mifflin Company

______. 2010. Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching: A Guide for Practitioners. New York: Routledge.

Cline, Frederick, et al. 2006. Focus Group Reactions to Three Definitions of Reading. Minneapolis, MN: National Accessible Reading Assessment Projects.

Gerot, Linda, & Peter Wignel.1995. Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Sydney: Gerid Stabler.

Grabe,Wignel, & Stoller, Fredricka. L. 2002. Teaching and Researching: Reading. Pearson Education.

Harley, Trevor. 2008. The Psychology of Language: From Data to Theory.New York: Psychology Press.

Kemmis, Stephen., & McTaggart, R. 1998. The Action Research Planner (3rd Edition). Victoria: Deakin University Press.

Klingner, Janette. K., et al. 2007. Teaching Reading Comprehension to Students with Learning Difficulties. New York: The Guilford Press.

Larson, Mildred L. 1984.Meaning-based translation: A guide to cross-language equivalence. Lanham: University Press of America.

Manalu, Mediana. 2014. Improving Sudents’ Achievement In Reading Comprehension Through Preview, Question, Read, Reflect, Recite, Review (PQ4R) Technique. A Thesis, Unpublished. State University of Medan.

Negari, et al. 2016. “ The Effect of Jigsaw Task on Iranian EFL Learners’ Reading Skill Improvementâ€. International Journal of Education Investigations. 3 (1), 10-19.

Permana, Tahan. D., & Zuhri, F. 2013. The implementation of Pictures Series as Media in Teaching Writing of Narrative Text of the Tenth Grades of Senior high School. Journal of Retain, 1 (1), 1-8.

Rathus, Spencer, A. 2013. Psychology: Concept & Connections. Nineth Edition. Belmont: Wads Worth Cengage Learning.

Robert, Tresa, A. 2017. Literacy Succes for Emergency Bilinguals: Getting it Right in the PreK-2 Classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.

Siahaan, Sanggam., Shinoda, Khisno. 2008.Generic Text Structure. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Syafirah, Lailatis. 2015.The Application of PQ4R To Improve Students’ Reading Comprehension. A Thesis, Unpublished. State Institute for Islamic Studies (IAIN) Salatiga.

Welsch, Kathryn, et.al. 2005. Metacognition in Literacy Learning: Theory, Assesment, Instruction and Professional Development. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher.

Westwood, Peter, S. 2008.What Teachers Need to Know About and Writing Difficulties. Victoria: Acer Press.

Winston, Rinehart. 2000. Introduction to Research in Education. Chicago: Longman

Published

2020-07-27

Issue

Section

Artikel