ERROR ANALYSIS ON THE USING BE OF SIMPLE PRESENT AND SIMPLE PAST TENSES AMONG THE SEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP NEGERI 2 NAINGGOLAN

Authors

  • Beriman Sinaga FKIP, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan
  • Viator Lumban Raja FKIP, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan
  • Fiber Yun Almanda Ginting FKIP, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan

Abstract

Grammar is the rules in a language for changing the form of words and joining them into sentences to create meaning. This research is focused on error analysis  on the using BE in Simple Present and Simple Past Tenses. The purpose of this study is to find out the grammatical errors in using BE in students’ composition. In this study the writer took the the seventh grade students of SMP Negeri 2 Nainggolan in the Academic Year of 2017/2018 consisting 25 students as the sample. The data are analyzed with descriptive qualitative method. The data were identified based on kinds of errors. The kinds of errors are omission and misordering. The results of the data analysis show that there are 155 errors made by the students in their compositions. The writer concluded that omission errors 68 or 61,80% in Simple Present Tense and  49 or 51% in Simple Past Tense, misordering errors 16 or 14,60% in Simple Present Tense and 22 or 23% in Simple Past Tense. But out of category there are 28 or 23,60 redundant sentences in Simple Present Tense and 25 or 26% redundant sentences in Simple Past Tense. The writer also concluded that there are two causes of errors, namely Translation and Carelesssness. Based on the result of the research, it is suggested that the students should learn and memorize grammatical rules an teachers should give clearer explanation on grammatical rules in English.

References

Anas, S. 2004. Penelitian Qualitative. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Anderson, G & Arsenault, N. 2005. Fundamentals of Education Research, Second Edition. London: Routledge Farmer

.

Brown.1994. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, Fourth Edition. New Jersey: Prenntice Hall.

Burnham, Daniel.2012. Data Analysis in Education Research. New York: Oxford University Press.

Corder, S.P.1982. Error Analysis and Interlanguage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dulay, H., Burt, M., and Krashen, S. 1982. Language Two. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, Rod. 2003. The Study of Second Language Aquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Frank, Marcella. 1972. Modern English; A Practical Reference Guide. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Harmer, Jeremy. 1983. The Practice of English Language Teaching. London: Longman Group.

Hornby, A. S. 2010. Oxford Dictionary, Eighth Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.

Husniati, Susanti. 2010. An Analysis on Grammatical Errors in Simple Present Tense on Students’Descriptive Writing. Unpublished Sarjana’s Thesis, Faculty of Teachers Training and Education: State Institute Islamic College Tulungagung.

James, Carl. 1998. Error in Language and Use. New York: Longman.

Johnson, B & Christensen, L. 2008. Educational Research. London: Sage Publication, Inc.

Knight, John. 2010. Methods and Instruments of Data Collection. Retrieved on June 21st, 2014, from http:www:scribd.com/doc/37790831/ Methods-and- Instruments -of- Data- Collection.

Noor, J. M. 2011. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Norrish, Jack. 1987. Language Learners and their Errors. London: longman Group.

Richard, John. 1974 Perspective on Second Language Acuisition. London: Longman.

Schreiber, James. 2008. Data in Given, Lisa M. (ed). 2008. The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods Volumes 1 & 2. California: Sage Publication.

Susan, M and Larry S. 2008. Second Language Aqusition. New York: Routledge.

Syarif, Widita. 2014. An Analysis of Students’ Errors in Using English Tenses. Unpublished Sarjana’s Thesis, Faculty of Teachers Training and Education: State Institute Islamic College Tulungagung.

Vivian, B. M. 1961. English Composition. New York: Barnes and Noble Books.

Published

2020-07-28

Issue

Section

Artikel