PENGARUH ETOS KERJA, BUDAYA ORGANISASI DAN KOMITMEN KARYAWAN TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN PADA PUSAT PENELITIAN KELAPA SAWIT (PPKS) UNIT MARIHAT PEMATANG SIANTAR

Authors

  • Febri Liana Sitio FEB, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan
  • Betniar Purba FEB, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan
  • Pandapotan Sitompul FEB, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan

Keywords:

Work Ethic, Organizational Culture, Employee Commitment, Employee Performance.

Abstract

This study aims to determine and explain the effect of work ethic, organizational culture and employee commitment on employee performance at the Palm Oil Research Center (PPKS) Marihat Unit Pematang Siantar. The population in this study were 230 permanent employees and the number of samples through the slovin formula with a total of 70 permanent employees. The analysis techniques used in this study are validity and reliability tests, multiple linear regression, t test, F test and the coefficient of determination (R2) using the help of SPSS Version 25. The results showed that there was an influence between the independent variables, namely work ethic, organizational culture and employee commitment on the dependent variable, namely employee performance. From the results of simultaneous testing (F test) shown in the Fcount value of (90,680) > Ftable (2.51) it can be concluded that work ethic, organizational culture and employee commitment have a simultaneous and significant effect on employee performance. From the results of partial testing (t test) obtained the value of Work Ethic tcount (6,951) > t table (1,668), Organizational Culture tcount value (4,761) > t table (1,668) and Employee Commitment tcount value (5,359) > t table (1,668). This means that Work Ethic, Organizational Culture and Employee Commitment have a positive and significant effect on Employee Performance at the Palm Oil Research Center (PPKS) Marihat Unit Pematang Siantar. The coefficient of determination (R Square) is 0.805. This means that variations in Employee Performance can be explained by variations in Work Ethic, Organizational Culture and Employee Commitment by 80.5% while 19.5% can be explained by other factors not discussed in this study.

References

Donni Juni Priansa. 2016. Perencanaan & Pengembangan SDM. Bandung: Cv.

Alfabeta.

Hardani., dkk. 2020. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Ilmu.

Husni, Lalu. 2014. Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.

Jakarta: PT. Spirit Mahardika.

Kasmir. 2018 Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Teori dan Praktik). Depok: Rajawali Pers.

Mangkunegara, Anwar Prabu. 2020. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan.

Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mathis, Robert L. & Jackson John H. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Alih Bahasa: Diana Angelica. Edisi ke-10. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat.

Nitisemito. 2001. Manajemen Personalia (Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia).

Edisi 4. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Ridwan, Akdon. 2011. Rumus dan Data Dalam Aplikasi Statistika. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Robbins, P. Stephen & Coulter Mary. 2012. Manajemen. Jakarta: Diterjemahkan Oleh Bob Sabran, Wibi Hardani. Erlangga.

Simamora, Henry. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Diterjemahkan oleh.

Yogyakarta: STIE.

Sinamo, J. H. 2011. Etos Kerja Profesional Navigator Anda Menuju Sukses. Sutrisno, Edy. 2019. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: Prenada

Media.

Triatna, C. 2015. Perilaku Organisasi dalam Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Wibowo. 2016. Manajemen Kinerja. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Wirawan. 2013. Evaluasi Kinerja Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Yogyakarta: STIE.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-30

Issue

Section

Articles