CODE SWITCHING IN SOCIAL MEDIA
Keywords:
Code-Switching, Social Media, qualitative analysisAbstract
This article deals with Code Switching in Social Media. The objectives of this research are to find out the kinds and the reasons of using code switching in social media. The sources which used in collecting the data are four social media they are Instagram, Facebook, TikTok and Twitter. This research used the qualitative analysis to carry out the study. The result of the analysis shows that there are three kinds of code switching and five the reasons of doing code switching: they are interjection, to reflect social status, Prestige and trend, lack of vocabulary, and topics. And based on the analysis of the study, it is found that the highest number of the kinds of code switching is intra sentential code switching which attain 48 data. The main reasons of the users in social media doing code switching is prestige and trends which attain 25 data and the most significances used code switching in social media is instagram which attain 29.References
Ardhana. L. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung : CV. Remaja.
Ary, Donald, Et. al. 2010. Introduction to Analysis in Education. Eight Edition. Canada: Nelson Education.
Bhatia, T.K., and Ritchie, W.C. 2004. Social and psychological Factors in Language Mixing. In W.C Ritchie and T.K Bhatia (eds.) handbook of Bilingualism (pp. 336-352). Blackwell Publishing.
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language history: From Language (H. Hoijer ed.). New York.
Chaer, Abdul dan Leonie Agustine. 2004. Sosiolinguistik: Perkenalan Awal. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Dittmar, N. 1976. Sociolinguistics: A Critical Survey of Theory and Application. London: Edward Arnold Ltd.
Elo, S, & Kyngas, H. (2007). The Qualitative Content Analysis Process.
Given, L.M. (2008). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Analysis Method. California: Sage Publication,Inc.
Grosjean, Francois. 1982. Life with Two language. Combridge: HarvardUniversity Press.
Gumperz, J. J. (ed.) (1982b). Language and Social Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Gunawan, I. 2014. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Teori dan Praktik, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Holmes, J. (2000). An Introduction to Pidgins and Creoles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lillis, T. (2013). The Sociolinguistics of Writing. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.
Merriam, S. 2009. Qualitative Analysis: a Guide to Design and Implication. San Fransisco. CA: Jossey- Bass.
Moleong, J, Lexy. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muysken, P. 2000. A Typology of Code Mixing. London: Cambridge University
Perdede, H and Kisno. (2012). Introduction to sociolinguistics: From general to local perspectives. Jakarta – Batam: LLC Publishing.
Poplack, S. 1980. “Sometimes I’ll Start a Sentence in Spanish y Termino en Espanol: Toward a Typology of Code-Switching.” Journal of Linguistics (18):581-618.
Press.Auer, P. (2017). Code-Switching in Conversation: Language, Interaction and Identity. Routledge.
Tuten, Tracy L. dan Solomon, Michael R. 2015. Social Media Marketing: 2nd Edition. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Trudgill, P. (2003). A Glossary of Sociolinguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Schmidt, A. (2014). Between the languages: Code-switching in bilingual communication. Hamburg: Anchor Academic Publishing.
Spolsky, B. (1998). Sociolinguistics. Oxford introductions to language study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wareing, Thomas. 1999. Language, Society and Power: An Introduction. USA: Routledge
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Wardhaugh, Ronald. (2006). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Australia: Blackwell Publishing.
