AHP-COPRAS untuk Pemeringkatan Ketersediaan Fasilitas Kesehatan di Indonesia

Authors

  • Setyawan Wibisono Universitas Stikubank Semarang
  • Wiwien Hadikurniawati Universitas Stikubank Semarang
  • Imam Husni Al Almin Universitas Stikubank Semarang

Keywords:

AHP, COPRAS, Covid-19, health resources, ranking

Abstract

In handling Covid-19, health resources are one of the factors that play a very important role in reducing the death rate. For this reason, we offer a study on the topic of ranking the availability of health resources in handling the Covid-19 pandemic in provinces in Indonesia using the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) and COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) hybrid methods. The use of the pairwise comparison matrix as a method for testing the validity of the weights for each criterion produces a weight value of 0.363760164 for the criteria for the number of doctors per population and the criteria for the number of nurses per population, a weight value of 0.1588353 for beds per 1000 people, a weight value of 0, 075333696 for the number of hospitals per population, and a weight value of 0.038310676 when going to the hospital. This ranking system places DKI Jakarta first with a utility value of 100%, while the second rank is the Special Region of Yogyakarta with a utility value of 63.59. There is a considerable gap compared to other provinces in terms of the availability of health resources in handling the Covid-19 pandemic. The availability of health facilities in DKI Jakarta is quite far when compared to other provinces in terms of the availability of health resources in handling the Covid-19 pandemic. DKI Jakarta remains the area with the most excellent health facilities.

References

Z. Gao, Y. Jiang, J. He, J. Wu, J. Xu, dan G. Christakos, “An AHP-based regional COVID-19 vulnerability model and its application in China,” Model. Earth Syst. Environ., vol. 8, no. 2, hal. 2525–2538, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s40808-021-01244-y.

Z. Liu, R. Ma, dan H. J. Wang, “Assessing urban resilience to public health disaster using the rough analytic hierarchy process method: A regional study in China,” J. Saf. Sci. Resil., vol. 3, no. 2, hal. 93–104, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jnlssr.2021.12.003.

S. Hezer, E. Gelmez, dan E. Özceylan, “Comparative analysis of TOPSIS, VIKOR and COPRAS methods for the COVID-19 Regional Safety Assessment,” J. Infect. Public Health, vol. 14, no. 6, hal. 775–786, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2021.03.003.

S. H. Razavi Hajiagha, S. S. Hashemi, dan E. K. Zavadskas, “A complex proportional assessment method for group decision making in an interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment,” Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ., vol. 19, no. 1, hal. 22–37, 2013, doi: 10.3846/20294913.2012.762953.

E. A. Adali dan A. T. Isik, “Air Conditioner Selection Problem With Copras and Aras Methods,” Air Cond. Sel. Probl. With Copras Aras Methods, vol. 5, no. 2, hal. 124–138, 2016.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-27

Issue

Section

Artikel