FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI KEPUTUSAN MAHASISWA BARU TAHUN AJARAN 2022/2023 PROGRAM STUDI MANAJEMEN FAKULTAS EKONOMI UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK SANTO THOMAS MEDAN

Authors

  • Peran Simanihuruk Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan
  • Christinus Manihuruk Fakultas Ekonomi Manajemen dan Bisnis Universitas Bina Nusantara

Keywords:

Products, Prices, Physical Evidence, People, Reference Groups, Motivation and Economic Condition

Abstract

The aim of the research is to analyze the factors that influence the decisions of new students for the 2022/2023 academic year of the lecture management study program at the Faculty of Economics, Catholic University of Santo Thomas Medan. Total sample of 189 respondents, data collection with questionnaires and documentation, method of analysis with factor analysis. The results showed that of the 36 factors that most dominantly influenced the decision of new students T.A 2022/2023 to study at the Catholic University of Economics, Santo Thomas Medan, it turned out that the most dominant were: Factor 1: Compatibility of subjects with a variety of courses, accreditation status, having student dormitory Image, quality of education and reputation. Factor 2 : Opportunity to get a scholarship , Public transportation, Has sports facilities and curriculum. Factor 3: Guaranteed future income, graduate quality and interest. Factor 4: Ease of getting a job, strategic campus location and complete facilities. Factor 5: More affordable tuition fees and expected job suitability. Factor 6: Family encouragement and tuition fees can be paid in stages. Factor 7 : Improving the social status of the family and Improving the economic situation of the family. Factor 8: Lecture time is more flexible and educational staff. Factor 9: Number of teaching staff, parental encouragement and recommendations from schools. Factor 10: Environmental security and the expected work in accordance with the choice of major. Factor 11: Quality of teaching staff and encouragement of friends. Factor 12: Greater job opportunities are accepted and alumni success. Factor 13: Having a commitment to learn, Creating a better future and Alumni recommendations. Researchers who only examined 36 factors, it is hoped that researchers will add further research indicators that are considered to influence prospective students in choosing a college study program. This research can be used as a reference for consideration in improving further research as well as for higher education management. For further research, it is hoped that the researcher will be able to increase the number of respondents who are sampled for potential student candidates.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Peran Simanihuruk, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan

Dosen

References

A Fadjar, Mukti. 2005. Perlindungan Hukum. Malang : Bagus Media Puslitbang.

Abin Syamsuddin Makmun. (2000). Psikologi Kependidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Agus, Irianto.2012. Pendidikan Sebagai Investasi Dalam Pembangunan Suatu Bangsa. Jakarta : Kencana.

Andina Kresna Nugrahini, (2018), Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi pemilihan jurusan dan kepuasan dalam menjalani jurusan di perguruan tinggi, Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta.

Beggs, J. M., Bantham, J. H., & Taylor, S. (2008). Distinguishing the factors influencing college students' choice of major. Project Innovation (Alabama), 42(2).

Chandra, Gregorius. (2005) Strategi dan Program Pemasaran. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Eprillison Vivina, 2014. Analisis Faktor Dopminan Yang Mempengaruhi Keputusan Mahasiswa Melanjutkan Pendidikan Ke Program Studi Pips Pascasarjana UNP, Journal Of Economic And Economic Education Vol. 3 No.1.

Fahmal, Muin, 2006, Peran Asas-asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Layak dalam Mewujudkan Pemerintahan yang Bersih, Yogyakarta: UII Press.

Fattah, Nanang. 2009. Landasan Manajemen Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Hair, J., Hult, G., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A Primier On Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). America: SAGE Publication, Inc.

Parasuraman, A. P., Zeithaml, V., & Malhotra, A. (2005). "E-S-Qual: A MultipleItem Scale for Assessing Electronic Service Quality". Journal of Service Research, 7, 213–233.

Parasuraman, A.P., dan Berry (2001). The Behaviorial Consequenses of Service Quality, Jurnal of Marketing,Vol 60.

Philip Kotler (2005) Managemen Pemasaran. edisi kesebelas Jakarta : PT. Indeks Kelompok Gramedia.

Philip Kotler , Keller. (2009). Manajemen Pemasaran. Penerbit Erlangga. Jakarta

Philip, Kotler, ( 2012) Manajemen Pemasaran Edisi 13, Bahasa Indonesia Jilid 1 dan 3 Cetakan. Jakarta: Rajawali

Philip, Kotler, Armstrong, Garry, 2008. Prinsip-prinsip Pemasaran,Jilid 1, Erlangga, Jakarta.

Yazici, S., & Yazici, A. (2010). Students choice of college major and their perceived fairness of the procedure: evidence from Turkey. Educational Research and Evalutation, 16(4), 371-382. doi: 10.1080/13803611.2010.528196

Yusuf. 2012. Psikologi Perkembangan Anak dan Remaja. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Soekanto, Soerjono, 2010. Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers

Todaro, Michael, P. Dan Stephen C. Smith, 2006, Pembangunan Ekonomi. Edisi Kesembilan, Jakarta : Erlangga.

Undang-Undang Sistem pendidikan nasional Nomor 20 Tahun 2003

Umar, Husain, 2005. Riset Sumber Daya Manusia dan Organisasi. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka. Cetakan Ketujuh.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-24

How to Cite

Simanihuruk, P. ., & Manihuruk, C. . (2023). FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI KEPUTUSAN MAHASISWA BARU TAHUN AJARAN 2022/2023 PROGRAM STUDI MANAJEMEN FAKULTAS EKONOMI UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK SANTO THOMAS MEDAN. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 23(1), 25–44. Retrieved from https://ejournal.ust.ac.id/index.php/JIMB_ekonomi/article/view/2508

Issue

Section

Artikel