Optimalisasi Pemilihan Lapangan Badminton: Integrasi Metode SAW dan AHP dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan
Keywords:
AHP, SAW, Pemilihan Lapangan BadmintonAbstract
Badminton is one of the most popular sports in the world, with Indonesia having achieved great success in international competitions. The high level of public interest in this sport requires the availability of adequate court facilities. However, the comfort of badminton court facilities still varies, so a decision support system is needed to help select the optimal court. This study develops a decision support system based on the integration of the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) methods. SAW is used for criterion weighting, while AHP is applied in the ranking stage of alternatives. This combination of methods was chosen due to its ability to process qualitative data from player and athlete evaluations, as well as quantitative court data, while addressing complex issues through hierarchy-based prioritisation. The results of the study indicate that the system is capable of consistently weighting criteria (CR < 0.1). This study also produced a ranking of badminton courts in North Brebes based on seven criteria (price, floor type, lighting, bathrooms, scoreboards, cooperatives, and parking lots) and identified priority facilities. Court 33 in Brebes was selected as the best alternative with a preference value of 0.7485.References
BWF, "Badminton Participation Report 2023," 2023.
Kemenpora RI, "Statistik Prestasi Olahraga Nasional," 2022.
D. Setiawan et al., "Quality Assessment of Public Sports Facilities," J. Sport Manag., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 45-60, 2021.
S. Handayani and R. Wijaya, "Decision Making in Sports Facility Selection," Int. J. Decis. Support Syst., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 12-25, 2022.
T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
A. Nurhayati et al., "User Satisfaction on Badminton Court Facilities," J. Phys. Educ., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 112-125, 2023.
M. A. Fauzi, "Standardization Challenges in Sports Facilities," IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 2345-2356, 2023. doi : 10.1109/TEM.2023.10023456
W. Hadikumiawati and I. H. Al Amin, "Decision Support System for Sports Lighting," Int. J. Comput. Appl., vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 78-92, 2021.
J. R. Figueira et al., Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. New York: Springer, 2005. doi : 10.1007/b100605
K. Yoon and C. L. Hwang, Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 2000.
E. Triantaphyllou, Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000. doi : 10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6
W. Ho, "Integrated AHP Applications," Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 186, no. 1, pp. 211-228, 2018. doi : 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.050
P. J. M. van Laarhoven and W. Pedrycz, "Fuzzy Extension of AHP," Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 11, no. 1-3, pp. 229-241, 1983. doi : 10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7
M. Behzadian et al., "TOPSIS Applications Survey," Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 39, no. 17, pp. 13051-13069, 2012. doi : 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056
R. T. Clemen and T. Reilly, Making Hard Decisions. Pacific Grove: Duxbury, 2014.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Endang Lestariningsih, Latifia Nadila, Widiyanto Tri Handoko, Imam Husni Al Amin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
