IMPROVING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ON NARRATIVE TEXTS THROUGH EXPERIENCE TEXT RELATIONSHIP (ETR) METHOD AT SMA SWASTA PALAPA MEDAN IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2020/2021

Authors

  • Yatafati Lahagu FKIP, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan
  • Jontra Jusat Pangaribuan FKIP, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan
  • Meikardo Samuel Prayuda FKIP, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54367/kairos.v4i2.1137

Abstract

This research was conducted in order to improve students’ Reading Comprehension on Narrative Texts through ETR method and to know the students’ responses towards the learning reading comprehension through ETR method at SMA Swasta Palapa Medan. In conducting this research, the writer used Classroom Action Research (CAR). This research showed that teaching reading comprehension through ETR method at SMA Swasta Palapa Medan could improve their reading comprehension. The result of the test showed that the students’ mean score in pre-test is 51.59 with 4 students (13,79%) of the students got score ≥70, in formative test the mean score is 68.69 with 15 students (51,72%) of the students got score ≥70, and in post-test the mean score is 77.66 with 21 students (72,41%) of the students got score ≥70. The writer concluded that ETR method could improve the eleventh grade students’ reading comprehension on narrative texts of SMA Swasta Palapa Medan. On the other hand, the students’ responses towards the method of the teaching sound good because above 80% of the students are interested, motivated and understand the lesson with the ETR method.

References

Afflerbach, P. 2018. Understanding and Using Reading Assessement, K-12 (3rd Ed.) Alexandra: ASCD.

Anderson, M., and Anderson, K. 1997. Text Types in English. Sidney: Macmilan Education Australia. PTY. LTD.

Arikunto, S. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (Edisi Revisi V). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Best, J. N., and Khan, J. V. 2002. Research in Education. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India.

Brown, H. D. 2000. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New York: Longman.

__________ 2004. Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Pearson Education.

Burns, P. C., Roe, B. D., and Ross, E. P. 1984. Teaching Reading in Today’s Elementary Schools (3rd Ed). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

__________ 2010. Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching: A Guide for Practitioners. London: Routledge.

Carrell, P. L, et al. 1989. Metacognitive Strategy Training for ESL Reading. Journal of Tesol Quarterly, 23(4), 647–675.

Gerot, L., and Peter, W. 1994. Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Gerd stabler :Sydney.

Grabe, W., and Stoller, F. L. 2020. Teaching and Researching Reading (3rd Ed). New York: Routledge.

Klingner, J. K, et al. 2007. Teaching Reading Comprehension to Students with Learning Difficulties. New York: The Guide for Press.

Lawrence, L. J. 2007. Teaching Reading to Children. New York. Cognitive And Metacognitive Reading Strategies Revisited: Implications for Instruction. The Reading Matrix, 7(3), 55-71.

Linse, C. T. 2005. Practical English Language Teaching: Young Learners. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

McQuillan, M. 2000. The Narrative Reader. London: Routledge.

Medina, S. L. 2012. Effects of Strategy Instruction in an EFL Reading Comprehension Course: A Case Study. Journal of Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, Departamento de Lenguas Extranjeras, 14(1), 79–89.

Mettetal, G. 2001. The What, Why and How of Classroom Action Research. The Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (JoSoTL). 2(1), 8.

Pang, S, et al. 2003. Teaching Reading: Educational Practices Series. France: Sadag, Bellegarde.

Patel, M. F., and Jain, P. M. 2008. English Language Teaching (Methods, Tools & Techniques). Jaipur: Sunrise Publisher & Distributor.

Permana, T. D., and Zuhri, F. 2013. The implementation of Pictures Series as Media in Teaching Writing of Narrative Text of the Tenth Grades of Senior high School. Journal of Retain, 1(1), 1-8.

Pramanik, C. D. 2015. The Implementation of the Experience-Text Relationship (ETR) Method to Improve Grade VIII Students’ Reading Comprehension at SMP N 9 Yogyakarta in the Academic Year of 2014/2015. An Unpublished Sarjana’s Thesis, Faculty of Languages And Arts: State University of Yogyakarta.

Roe, B. D., and Smith, S. H. 2012. Teaching Reading in Today’s Elementary Schools (11th Ed). Belmont: Cengage Learning.

Samosir, D. N., and Meisuri. 2013. Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension Achievement in Narrative Text through Experience- Text- Relationship (ETR) Method. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning of FBS UNIMED, 2(2), 1-14.

Snow, C. C. 2002. Reading for Understanding towards An R & D Program in Reading Comprehension. Santa Monica: RAND.

Thomas, R. M. 2003. Blending Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods in Theses and Dissertations. California: Corwin Press.

Winter, R., and Giddings, C. 2001. A Handbook for Action Research in Health and Social Care. New York: Routledge.

Published

2021-03-16

How to Cite

Lahagu, Y., Pangaribuan, J. J., & Prayuda, M. S. (2021). IMPROVING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ON NARRATIVE TEXTS THROUGH EXPERIENCE TEXT RELATIONSHIP (ETR) METHOD AT SMA SWASTA PALAPA MEDAN IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2020/2021. Kairos English Language Teaching Journal, 4(2), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.54367/kairos.v4i2.1137

Issue

Section

Artikel