ERROR ANALYSIS ON PRONOUN MADE BY THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMA KATOLIK CINTA KASIH TEBING TINGGI IN ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2020/2021

Authors

  • Aswani Jelita Sianturi FKIP, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan
  • Novalina Sembiring FKIP, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan
  • Fiber Yun A Ginting FKIP, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan

Abstract

The Research was aimed to analyze the error on pronoun made by the eleventh grade students of SMA Katolik Cinta Kasih Tebing Tinggi in Academic Year of  2020/2021. The subject of this research consists of 30 students in XI-MIPA-1. The objectives of the study were (1) To find out the types of error made by students in using pronoun. (2) To find out what causes the students made such error in using pronoun. This research used qualitative approach with descriptive research. The errors were collected, identified, and classified based on the Surface Structure Taxonomy by Dulay. It was specified by four types of errors namely omission, addition, misordering, and misformation.The result showed (1) The most common errors made by the students were misformation (52,0%) or 88 errors. The second was error in addition with the frequency (35,5%) or 60 errors. The third error was omission (11,2%) or 19 errors. The lowest frequency of error was misordering (1,1%) or 2 errors. (2) The students made such errors in using pronouns because of their less motivation of learning, lack of knowledge about grammar and English language, and minimal use of media by the teacher during teaching learning process. The teacher should create an interesting teaching, so it that can increase the students’ interest in learning English.

References

Bodgan & Biklen. 2007. Qualitative Research for Education: an Introduction to Theory and Methods 5th edition. Boston: Pearson Education Inc.

Brown, H. D. 2007. Principles of Language and Teaching. New York: Pearson Education.

Camara et al. 2007. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication. London: Routledge.

Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. 2005. Introduction: discipline and practice of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: California.

Dulay, H. 1982. Language Two. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harmer, J. 2001. How to Teach English. England: Pearson Education Limited.

James, C. 2001. Error in Language Use: exploring Error Analysis. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Kumar, K. 2019. Parts of Speech (Pronoun). Chaman: KK Publications.

Meyers, A. 2005. Gateways to Academic Writing: Effective Sentences Paragraph and Essay. New York: Longman.

Minichiello, V. 2009. In-depth Interviewing: Researching People. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire

Murphy, R. 1998. English Grammar in Use. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Norrish, J. 1983. Language Learner and Their Error. London: Mac Millan Publisher, Ltd.

Payne, T. E. 2011. Understanding English Grammar: A Linguistic Introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Spillner, B. 2017. Error Analysis in the World. New York: Pearson Education.

Suryani and Hidayatullah. 2017. Error Analysis of The Students’ Test Result on Using Personal Pronouns. Dedikasi Pendidikan Journal, 1 (1), 65-73.

Susanti, D. 2018. An Error Analysis on Pronouns Used by The Eight-Grade Students at SMPN 18 Malang in Writing Recount Texts. An Unpublished Sarjana’s Thesis, Faculty of English Language Education Department Teacher Training And Education: University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

Sutor, M. 2015. Non-native Speech in English Literature. Munchen: Herbert Utz Verlag GmbH.

Published

2021-03-16

Issue

Section

Artikel