IMPROVING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION THROUGH CONTEXT CLUES STRATEGY AT THE EIGHTH GRADE OF SMP DHARMA WANITA MEDAN

Authors

  • Apriliyanti Apriliyanti FKIP, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan
  • Karisma E. Tarigan FKIP, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan
  • Jontra Jusat Pangaribuan FKIP, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54367/kairos.v2i3.733

Abstract

Reading is one of the four language skills in English, they are listening, speaking, reading and writing. Students get bored with reading and it is very difficult for them to work with it because they do not understand how to comprehend a reading material. Thus, they need some ways or strategy which could help students’s reading comprehension on narrative text. The teacher should be creative to search for interesting strategy to teach reading comprehension on narrative text. Context Clues strategy can help the students to understand a narrative text. The objectives of this study to find out the students’ reading comprehension by Context Clues strategy. The subject of this study were the eighth grade students of SMP Dharma Wanita Medan. In conducting this research the writer used Classroom Action Research (CAR) as the method of research. The test was used to gather the quantitative data. Based on the finding of this study, it showed in pre-test only 3 students (10%) who passed KKM (the Mastery Minimum Criteria), and  post test 27 students (90%). The result of this research revealed that there was a significant improvement of the students’ achievement in the post test. This improvement was shown by the comparison between the mean scrore of pre-test (47,26), and post test (80.33). Furthermore, the students were interested in Context Clues Strategy, it can be seen from their full attention during the teaching learning process. Therefore, Context Clues Startegy was effective strategy in helping students to improve their reading comprehension especially in narrative text.

References

Alderson, Charles. 2000. Assessing Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Anderson, Neil. “Reading†in Nunan, David (Ed). 2003. Practical English Language Teaching. New York: McGraw Hill.

Apriliawati, Anis. 2009. Comprehending Text Types. Bekasi: Ganesha Exact.

Ayres, Ian. 2008. Narrative Text. New York: Plenum Press.

Brown, Douglas. 2004. Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Pearson Education.

Burns, Anne. 2010. Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching: A Guide for Practitioners. London: Routledge.

Burn, Patrick. C.,et al. 1990. Teaching Reading in Today’s Elementary School. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Denton, Norma. 2007. Effective Instruction in Reading for Middle School Students. Texas: Texas Education.

French, Lisa. 2002. Content-Area Reading Strategies: Social Studies. Portland: J. Weston Walch.

Gambrell. Beck. and Headley, Kei. 2006. Developing Vocabulary by Learning Words through Context: The Vocabulary-enriched Classroom: Practices for Improving the Reading performance of All Students in Grades 3 and up. New York: Scholastic.

Grabe, William and Stoller, Fredricka. 2002. Teaching and Researching Reading. London: Pearson Education.

Graves, Mayen. 1986. Vocabulary Learning and Instruction. Journal of Research in Education, 1 (3), 49-89.

Goodman, Yetta. 1980. Reading Strategies Focuus on Comprehension, NewYork: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Heilman, Grue. 1981. Principles and Practice of Teaching Reading. Denver: Centennial.

Karbalaei, Ann. 2012. The Effects of Explicit Teaching of Context Clues at Undergraduate Level in EFL and ESL Context. European Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 1 (3), 68-77.

Kiani, Niro. 2011. On the Use of Novel as a Teaching Material in EFL Classrooms: Why and How?. Journal of Economics Development & Research, 2 (6),283-285.

Kruidenier, John. 2002. The Principles for Adult Basic Education Reading Instruction.Washington DC: The National Institue for Literacy.

Loucher, Cross. 2001. Across the Content Areas. Alexandria: Deep Publish.

Masyarah, Fitri. 2012. The Effectiveness of Context Clues Strategy in Reading Comprehension. Sarjana’s Thesis, faculty of Teachers Training and Education: University of Jember

Ngadiso, Putra. 2007. Statistics. Surakarta: State University of Surakarta.

Patel, M. F., & Jain M, P. 2008.English Language Teaching (Method, Tools and Technique).New York: Sunrise Publisher & Distributors.

Richadson, Judy. 2009. Reading to Learn in the Content Areas. London: Commonwealth University.

Snow, Christine. 2002. Reading for Understanding: Toward An R&D Program in Reading Comprehension. Washington DC: Rand Corporation.

Stahl, Sig and Fairbanks, Mjun. 1986. The Effects of Vocabulary Instruction: A Model Based Meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Research, 5(6), 72-110.

Winston, Rinehart. 2000. Introduction of Research in Education. New York: Longman.

Yuen, Jong. 2009. Context Clue Detectives: Empowering Students with a Self-learning Device through the Teaching of Context Clues. Unpublished Sarjana’s Thesis. University of California.

Zemelman, Daniel and Hyde Samuels. 1998. Reading Comprehension, New York: Oxford University Press.

Published

2020-06-17

How to Cite

Apriliyanti, A., Tarigan, K. E., & Pangaribuan, J. J. (2020). IMPROVING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION THROUGH CONTEXT CLUES STRATEGY AT THE EIGHTH GRADE OF SMP DHARMA WANITA MEDAN. Kairos English Language Teaching Journal, 2(3), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.54367/kairos.v2i3.733

Issue

Section

Artikel